I've never delved into the whole "are newspapers dying" question before, but after reading the Sunday Tennessean yesterday and thinking about it further, especially in light of a fellow blogger's troubles with this exact problem, I can only conclude that they are. It's a shame--I am one of those people who thoroughly enjoy reading the paper over a cup of coffee in the morning.
But it's not something I *need* to do. Those are an extra 15 minutes in the morning I could spend sleeping.
The first thing I noticed in pulling the Sunday Tennessean from the plastic bag was how much thinner it had become. It was about the size of what I remember the Friday paper being back in the day. While it is a welcome development to not have to dig through so many ads to find the comics, it's also an ominous sign, of the ad revenue lost and the sections that had to be cut out as a result.
So I turn to the front page section. And it's all news that I already knew about, either from the Internet or from the cable stations. The biggest story was about the Steve McNair funeral, which had been on TV the day before, so I didn't need to read about it a second time. There's not much in the way of good investigative journalism on the front page like there used to be.
Next came the "Issues" section. I used to write letters to the Tennessean before I started blogging, but most of mine were neither hyperbolical nor nonsensical enough to get published. The paper still comes out with a well-written main editorial every now and then, but are those still effective at shaping opinion? Meanwhile, the Tennessean has tried to "balance" any perception of liberal bias by publishing the worst of the right-wing columnists. I might appreciate a well-written, thought-provoking column by a conservative who could encourage readers to think about issues in different lights than the mainstream media memes. That conservative is not Phil Valentine. Come on, make it harder for me to refute your talking points, it's no fun if it's too easy! Honestly, most conservative bloggers in this state could come up with at least a more coherent 1,000 word column.
Well, I still need to read "Local News," right? Not really. If I want to know what's going on in Metro government at any given moment, I simply turn to
Mike Byrd's Twitter feed, especially during Metro Council meetings. For other political news, in addition to business news, I've got
Nashville Post, which discusses it in more depth. I certainly don't need the latest fluff piece from Gail Kerr. And if I want to know what's happening around town, we've got the
Nashville Scene and
Nashvillest.
Sports! I still need sports news, right? Eh, not really. Any fast-breaking Titans, Predators, or Vanderbilt news can be quickly found respectively on
Music City Miracles,
On The Forecheck, and
VandySports. Any other scores I need can be checked on ESPN. As shocked as I'm sure everyone will be to hear this, I don't particularly care about NASCAR. And I have no great desire to read Joe Biddle's and David Climer's concern troll columns everyday.
As I mentioned before, I still want to read the comics, right? I love "Peanuts" and "Garfield", and I swear that "Zits" is actually about my little brother and my mom. But more and more lately, the comics feel like something I've outgrown. I still like following them, but they're not as funny or relevant as they once were. Even "Doonesbury" feels tired lately.
There's no need to read the rest of the "Living" section either. Movie showtimes I can get either from the "Showtimes" app on my iPhone or from Fandango. I can do a Sudoku on the hardest level but can't even do the Monday crossword puzzles. And any interesting art or entertainment happenings, once again, will be in the Scene. Honestly though, I think "Ms. Cheap" is probably the best thing the paper has going for it right now, even if that smug smirk annoys me to no end.
So it occurred to me yesterday morning over a cup of coffee that there's really no need for me to read this paper anymore, aside from sentimental reasons.
****************************
It's not just the
Tennessean though. There's not much to the
City Paper anymore, although the glossy print was a nice touch. I still pick it up in front of my office on Mondays though, if only to read
Kleinheider's column (Hey SouthComm, that's the only reason I read it on Mondays! Be sure to keep paying that man!). I love the Scene, but again, all of their content is online (although I promise that if I get into the "You Are So Nashville If" contest I'll pick up copies for the whole family!). This past year I subscribed to the
St. Louis Post-Dispatch, and while it did help me to learn about what to expect in my new city, I don't know that I still need it for next year.
I don't know what the answer is. It's not that I don't *want* to read the newspaper anymore, but that I don't *need* to. I suspect I'm not the only one who feels that way. If newspapers are going to survive and compete with the Internet, they need to come up with a reason why we *need* to read them. Better investigative journalism, not just stories off the wire or fluff columns, would be a good start.