Monday, March 31, 2008

Keegan Bell Leaving Vanderbilt

Tennessean:


Freshman point guard Keegan Bell, who played in every game during Vanderbilt’s 26-8 season, will leave the program and transfer at the end of the spring semester, school officials and his father said Monday.

“We didn’t feel like Keegan was a great fit there,” said Dan Bell, Keegan’s father and a longtime coach in the Alabama high school ranks. “Coach (Kevin) Stallings and his staff are good people. It’s quite obviously a Top 20 program. It’s a great school, great people, a great year.

“We just felt like he’d have an opportunity to do some more things somewhere else.”


Yeah, good luck with that. A short white guy who's averaging 2.7 ppg might be able to do more things somewhere else in the SEC....like carry the water bottles. He had plenty of opportunities to come off the bench and make a difference, but he didn't deliver.

He had good heart and speed, but ultimately he's replaceable. Jermaine Beal is a solid player and will only get better, and football player/basketball walk-on Jamie Graham has in my view shown more potential than almost anyone else on the bench. I'm not mourning this loss.

Garnish Her Wages!

The Clinton campaign is just now getting around to paying the nearly $300,000 in unpaid health insurance premiums that she's owed to two insurance companies for several months.

But the unpaid bills to Aetna were at least two months old, according to FEC filings.

They show the campaign ended last year owing Aetna more than $213,000 for “employee benefits.”

During the first two months of the year, the campaign did not pay down any of that debt. In fact, it accrued another $16,000 in unpaid bills last month, and it finished the month owing Aetna $229,000.


It might be seen as an honest mistake, if the Clinton campaign didn't have a history of not paying their bills.

One of the factors superdelegates will have to look at is the two candidates' fundraising ability. It's blindingly clear who wins on that count--Obama can pull in record amounts from small donors while Hillary struggles to pay off her debts.

Her healthcare plan involves garnishing the wages of those who won't pay for health insurance, so I say the next time this happens, we ought to garnish her Senate salary until she pays the bills. Hey, we're only taking her at her word, right?

The Change Is All Connected

On Liberadio(!) this morning, Nashville mayor Karl Dean stated that he voted for Barack Obama in the Tennessee primary.

It doesn't surprise me much--Dean and Obama were both political outsiders who had to work their way up rather than relying on connections and family members to get into politics. They have more in common than one might think.

Interestingly, Karl Dean revealed his vote over Freddie O'Connell's protestations, who now wonders whether or not it was an attempt to nudge Phil Bredesen into endorsing.

The Superdelegates Are Getting Restless, Part 2

Now they're getting restless en masse:


Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota is expected to endorse Sen. Obama Monday, according to a Democrat familiar with her plans. Meanwhile, North Carolina's seven Democratic House members are poised to endorse Sen. Obama as a group -- just one has so far -- before that state's May 6 primary, several Democrats say.

If Obama handily wins North Carolina as is expected, and manages to at least keep it close in Pennsylvania and Indiana, then you can go ahead and count Florida and Michigan as is and Obama would still have the lead in pledged delegates and the popular vote. These superdelegates understand this, and they want to do their part to end this thing without a convention fight.

Now, if one of the North Carolina Democrats could make a phone call to another North Carolina Democrat and ask him to do the right thing, that would be great.

Sunday, March 30, 2008

The Final Straw

As I said earlier, there is a certain "feminist" blog in Tennessee that I will no longer link to here. You may have heard of them--they're in Tennessee, they claim to use Guerilla tactics, and they're Women (as far as we know. I take them at their word that they're not just a bunch of frat boys making an elaborate parody of feminism, because that's what it seems like sometimes).

Yesterday was the final straw. They posted something so offensive that even after this election is over, I believe that they will still be unable to regain any of their credibility.

Regarding the possibility of Condoleezza Rice being John McCain's Vice President on the Republican ticket:

If the old guard Democrats were to succeed at pushing the woman off the Democratic ticket only to face a Black woman on the Republican ticket, that would mean there really is a goddess and she really is pissed. And it would mean that Democrats might well be waiting another 50 years for their next 2-term president.

******************************

Republicans would never stand for the media to treat Rice or any other woman on the Republican ticket with the vile disrespect showered on Hillary Rodham Clinton. Democrats have benefited from and all but begged corporate media to insult Hillary, and thus all women, with daily barrels of misogyny. With Condi Rice on the ticket, I'm guessing sexism becomes a firing offense at MSNBC. And I'm guessing Rush Limbaugh begins to look like a sensitive and gracious gentleman next to sexist thug Bill Maher.

Why am I a Democrat? I forget.


First of all, it's a moot point. There is no way in hell that Condoleezza Rice is going to get on the ticket. McCain's going to need someone more conservative than that. If a good portion of the Republican base is going to have to hold their noses to vote for McCain, I think Condi on the ticket would send them all over the edge.

Second, no, they're not outright saying that they would definitely vote for McCain/Condi should Hillary not get the Democratic nomination. But the fact that they would even bring up the possibility indicates what kind of "feminists" they really are...the kind that would throw the baby out with the bathwater and throw their daughters' and granddaughters' rights out with it too, just

And although this should go without saying, if you would even consider voting for one of the chief architects of the war in Iraq, someone who would definitely not be looking for a way to end the war, just because she happens to have a vagina and the Democratic candidate doesn't, then forget not being a feminist.

You. Are. A. Murderer.

That's not just me being dramatic. The blood of every American soldier that dies after January 20, 2009 would be on your hands. Your vote wouldn't have been some idealistic "protest vote", it would have been a vote saying, "I'm ok with spending 100 more years in Iraq, because that'll show those icky sexist Democrats for not nominating my candidate!"

And the worst part about this is that Hillary Clinton herself said just a few days ago that her supporters shouldn't go down that route. So for once, in this instance, my beef is not with Hillary Clinton, it's with some of her supporters who have so twisted the concept of feminism into something ugly, vile, counter-productive, and ultimately anti-woman.

There are so many other feminist issues that are sorely lacking in discussion. In Afghanistan (you know, that place where we were going to overthrow the Taliban, find bin Laden, and make life better for some of the most oppressed women in the world), families are selling their young daughters in marriage to lenders whom they cannot afford to repay. Yes, progress! Right here in the U.S., we're in the midst of a debate over surrogacy arrangements...whether you can pay someone for that and whether or not that can lead to exploitation of poor women. But the site that claims to speak for Tennessee women doesn't care about any of that, because none of that has anything to do with Hillary Clinton. Perhaps it was different back in 2005, I don't know.

What I do know is that the aforementioned site can no longer claim to speak for Tennessee feminists, and they will not be able to do so after the election. Someone else may have to step in to fill in the void...

Obamachu, I Choose You!

Funniest damn video I've seen in a long time. I fully admit that I played this video game when I was younger, and whoever made this video got it exactly right.

So here you go...the 2008 election as a Pokemon battle:

The Sunday Liberal Blog Roundup, 3-30-08

Note: While I'm obviously thrilled that the TennViews roundup is back, there is one blog that I have deleted from this list because I refuse on principle to link to them. More on that later.


The Sunday "spring break's over, back to work" edition of the TennViews weekly blog roundup showcasing the best bloggers in Tennessee and what they are talking about...

• 10,000 Monkeys and a Camera: Five Years. 4000 Dead.

• 55-40 Memphis: So the Clintons want Obama to lose to McCain, so Bill is still in power and Hillary has a shot at the presidency in four years.

• Aunt B.: Why, you may ask, are toll roads in Tennessee a stupid idea?

• BlountViews: Our education system is preparing students for jobs that do not even exist.

• Carole Borges: At a time when our economy is grinding to a halt, why outsource this plum contract to a foreign firm?

• The Crone Speaks: Shorter version, protect the companies, screw the people, and let’s not deal with correcting the economic bubble.

• Cup of Joe Powell: My Congressman thinks I'm an idiot.

• Don Williams: How Arthur C. Clarke’s voice of cosmic wonder changed OUR lives.

• The Donkey's Mouth: The scurrilous claims made by a fellow Republican about the inappropriate use of campaign funds could be a problem for Blackburn further on down the road.

• Enclave: The voters are leaving party leaders in the dust today, in the rodeo dust of a Ft. Worth Coliseum.

• Fletch: The Tao of Dinghy

• KnoxViews: Scenic Vista Act update (Bonus: Spirited Democratic primary strengthens candidates and the party)

• Lean Left: But, aside from setting the Republican double standard in concrete for all to see, Rice’s remarks are kind of amusingly pathetic.

• Left of the Dial: More lottery suspicions

• Left Wing Cracker: After this, it doesn't matter. She can win in Pennsylvania but it doesn't matter, her campaign will end unsuccessfully.

• Liberadio: Dana Perino is so uncomfortable answering for President Bush’s crimes against humanity that I almost feel sorry for her.

• Loose TN Canon: Hobbs deleted my comments!

• NewsComa: Newspapers, this is the new world of communication and how news is evolving.

• Pesky Fly: The only credible conclusion I can come to is that Mark Penn, whose lobbying firm is run by one of McCain's top advisors, is simply teeing up Obama for a general election sweep.

• Progressive Nashville: Insurance companies don't want you to use the insurance. They just want you to pay for it.

• Resonance: What's the point in holding elections if the delegates need not honor the results?

• RoaneViews: Congressman Lincoln Davis... Relaxed

• Russ McBee: In Dick Cheney's mind, the misguided and mendacious decisions made by his "boss" are somehow more of a burden than the loss felt by those 4,000 families.

• Sean Braisted: Now, in an effort to show that Hillary Clinton is the only person left running for President who can answer a phone past 2:30AM, she tries to tie the economy to late-night/early-morning phone calls:

• Sharon Cobb: Another day, another lie from Hillary

• Silence Isn't Golden: (W)ine in the grocery store won't drive the big-spending customers away from the retailers.

• Southern Beale: President Bush and his economic advisers assume that people will rush off to WalMart to load up on more cheap Chinese-made crap they don’t need as soon as the check arrives.

• TennViews: New challenger in TN Senate 4th District

• Vibinc: No one is going to heal the divisions, fix the crime, educate our kids, stop the cycle of poverty, or lower teen pregnancy and infant mortality for us Memphis, we have to do it for ourselves.

• Whites Creek Journal: There is a serious problem for both Clinton and McCain in this election cycle... They are both up against an honest person.

Women's Health News: Nipple Ring as National Security Threat

Friday, March 28, 2008

YDA Spring Conference To Be In Nashville

The Young Democrats of America have just announced that the national spring conference will be held right here in Nashville. And I'll be home for it!

YDA is excited to officially announce that our Spring National Conference, held in partnership with the Tennessee Young Democrats, will be in Nashville, TN at the Hilton Downtown Nashville. Join us as we kickoff YDA's first-ever truly National Youth Coordinated Campaign to turnout young voters, take back the White House, and swing elections up and down the ballot.

At the Sping Conference you will plot strategy, take home vital campaign resources, and learn how all your hard work is the key to achieving our national goals. Come see how you, your state chapter, local chapter, and caucus can join this historic coordinated effort to officially make this the year of the young voter.

Also, we like to have a good time in YDA, and after all, we are in Music City, U.S.A! Once all that hard work planning and preparing is done, reward yourself with some good ol' fashioned fun in Nashville's world famous bar and club district, Music Row, with enough live music to suite the even most eclectic tastes.

Thursday, March 27, 2008

Gun Incident In Louisville

Another campus gun incident, this time at the University of Louisville, only the tragedy occurred off-campus:


Louisville Metro Police are investigating the deaths of two children found in a home in the Okolona area this morning, according to Officer Phil Russell, a Louisville Metro Police spokesman.

********************

The request to check on the children came during a hostage incident at the student health center at the U of L Belknap campus.

U of L officials said that university police received a call at 8:32 a.m. from the center, which is on South Brook Street, that they needed help escorting a female student to University Hospital’s emergency room for mental-health reasons.

But two minutes later, the university police received an alarm from the center. An officer arrived at the center moments later and reported the student was brandishing a gun and holding a counselor hostage, U of L President James Ramsey said.


Now, I'm sure the conservatives will use this to point to an "epidemic" of college shootings and use it to advance the argument that students should be allowed to carry guns on campus. Unfortunately, that wouldn't have done any good in this situation, unless you think we should allow 13-year olds to go armed as well. That'll show their mothers!

Good for U of L, for having a working alert system in place and for having the campus police on the scene to defuse the situation immediately. That saved more lives than another student with a gun could ever have.

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Crazy For Tryin', Crazy For Cryin', Crazy For Watching This Show

As addicted as I am to American Idol, there are some nights when I really, really hate it. Like tonight.

Kristy Lee Cook, this season's "country singer" who should have been voted off a while ago (her country rendition of "Eight Days A Week" on the first Beatles night undoubtedly had John Lennon spinning in his grave), got a reprieve and escaped the bottom 3 this week. Why? Because she sang Lee Greenwood's "God Bless The U.S.A." last night, making a last ditch attempt to appeal to her country fans.

And by God, it worked. The idiots who equate true patriotism wearing flag lapels and putting "Support the Troops" bumper stickers on their SUV's did their American duty and voted for her. Meanwhile, the far more talented and entertaining Chikezie was sent home.

It reminds me of Season 5, when country music's current "It Girl" Kellie Pickler stuck around far longer than she deserved. She induced cringes basically every time she opened her mouth, but the country fans heard that accent and called in!

Kellie Pickler and Kristy Lee Cook epitomize everything I hate about country music today. It might as well be an entirely different genre from classic country. It's glossy, slick, prepackaged. It evokes small-town Southern life not as a source of inspiration, but as a marketing scheme. And it's awful.

The other day, the classic country song "Crazy" by Patsy Cline came up on my iPod. It was completely random, I don't even remember downloading it. It's a beautiful song, she had the most rich and textured voice. Willie Nelson's lyrics were very simple but at the same time very moving.

Can you imagine what would happen if these people tried to get a record deal in Nashville today? Patsy Cline would be told she didn't have the right "look", that she'd need to get implants and dye her hair blonde. And Willie would be told to add some references to beer and trucks to his lyrics.

But like the idiot I am, I will continue to watch that show. It's a train wreck you can't turn away from.

It's All About The Supreme Court

Whenever I express my intense dislike of Hillary Clinton to one of her supporters, I usually get some variation of "It's all about the Supreme Court" in response. I don't deny that point; I certainly would rather have Hillary than John McBush picking John Paul Stevens' replacement. Indeed, one of Bill Clinton's best legacies was to appoint justices who would stick to the established legal principle of the right to privacy, rather than overturning decades' worth of precedent for a political agenda.

But today, a new Gallup poll shows that 28% of Clinton supporters would vote for McCain rather than Obama in a general election match-up.

Now, I'm sure there is a bit of an exaggeration here. The heat of the primary certainly has everyone tense and rancorous, so I'm sure the actual number will be lower than that.

But it still begs the question--does this mean that as of right now, almost a third of Clinton supporters would rather see another Roberts or Alito on the bench than allow Obama the opportunity to appoint someone better? Does this mean that even as they make that argument to me, the argument holds no water with them?

Sometimes it seems like it.

Oh well. You may have to go to Canada for an abortion or birth control in the future, but by God, you can sleep well at night knowing that the uppity elitist with the mean supporters isn't in power!

Because that's what REAL feminists do! If we don't get a female nominee, then we'll just throw the baby out with the bathwater and allow the continued assault on our rights to go unchallenged. That'll show those misogynist Obama supporters! And hey, we're well-to-do white women, we'll always have access to birth control. Millions of other women may not under McCain...

...but their votes are insignificant in the general election anyway.

Hill Hobbs

Congratulations, Hillary. You have now sunk far beyond John McCain's level. You're now on par with Bill Hobbs, in slandering Obama and his advisors as anti-Semitic.

Marc Ambinder is right...if advocating Israel's return to the pre-1967 borders is anti-Semitic, that means that every U.S. president since 1967 was anti-Semitic. Really, that means that Bill Clinton was probably the most anti-Semitic president of all, since he spent the better part of eight years trying to convince the Israelis to do just that.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

God And Chocolates On Your Pillow

Hotel Preston near Opryland has decided to stop the practice of putting Bibles in their nightstands, as is done at most other hotels:

Instead, travelers will have to call room service to order it from a "spiritual menu," which will include other literary offerings like the Book of Mormon, the Quran and books on Scientology, said Dina Nishioka, public relations director for Hotel Preston.


This will be in addition to the "pillow menu" that Hotel Preston already offers. Personally, I like the idea of a pillow menu better. I sometimes have problems sleeping in hotels because I get an allergic reaction when I sleep on feather pillows. I know that sounds strange, but if I do, I wake up all stuffed up and with red splotches on my face. So with a pillow menu, I could avoid that.

But I'm interested to see how this "spirituality menu" works out. I hope they don't charge for the service, although I wonder if you'll still have to tip the bellhop who brings the books up to you. Is anyone really going to notice that the Bibles are gone?

Hillary Can Tell Everybody This Is Her Song

(Note: You have no idea how tempting it was to title this post "The Bitch Is Back" after another Elton John song. But I decided not to because a) that would be too easy and too obvious and b) because I don't want to lower myself to the level of certain Hillary supporters in the blogosphere)

Interesting e-mail this morning from the Clinton campaign--for a small donation, you could have a chance to win a trip to New York City for a private concert that Elton John will be giving just for Clinton supporters! And even if you don't win, don't worry...you can still go to the concert for the low, low price of $1000 a ticket!

What, was Barbra Streisand not available?

Here's what the e-mail says:


We're sending two supporters, along with their guests, to New York with VIP tickets for this very special, one-night-only concert on April 9, and it could be you. We will have a chance to talk just you and I -- and you will get to meet Elton John at the party we're throwing afterwards. It's going to be a great night.


But if you read the rules and regulations on the Clinton website (yes, I'm a dork, but if I'm going to be a kick-ass lawyer I have to read the fine print), it just says that you get admission to the afterparty. There's no guarantee that you'll get to have a heart-to-heart with Hillary or with Elton. But I'm sure you'll get a nice handshake or a photo-op at least.

I do wonder how much Elton's charging the campaign for this. Even if he and Hillary are friends, I'm sure this isn't the sort of thing he does pro bono. Come to think of it, that's probably why they didn't get Barbra to do it--I couldn't imagine how much more she'd charge for it.

Meanwhile, Obama doesn't have to bribe his supporters to gain small contributions over the Internet.

Stop Wining

The geniuses in the State Senate have deferred the proposal to allow wine to be sold in grocery stores, thus stalling it indefinitely. This comes despite widespread consumer support for the measure.

Here's something to consider, something that hasn't really been brought up in this debate. The wholesalers and the retailers claim that allowing wine to be sold in the grocery stores would cause them to lose money, despite evidence of that not happening in other states. But grocery stores still would not necessarily offer the selection that you could get in a liquor store. I'm not saying wine sold in Publix wouldn't be good wine, but it would probably look more like Trader Joe's Two-Buck Chuck than, say, a classified-growth Bordeaux (but again to clarify, I'm not saying Two-Buck Chuck is bad; on the contrary, it's probably one of the best bargains out there).

But wine in the grocery store won't drive the big-spending customers away from the retailers. The people who drop that kind of money on wine...the ones who drink Bordeaux or who constantly seek out the newest and hottest California vineyards or who look for more unusual wines like Spanish Rioja or Argentinean Malbec...they'll still go to the liquor stores for the more varied selection.

And besides, you'll still have to go to the package store for hard liquor. I have absolutely nothing to back this up other than a hunch, but I'd be willing to bet that whiskey probably sells better than wine in Tennessee anyway. And of course, beer will always be the top-seller.

None of the arguments against this measure stand up to scrutiny. The loss of business and employment for package stores didn't happen in the 33 other states where this has been allowed. No correlation between wine in grocery stores and underage drinking has been proven (because the kids go for the beer anyway!), and Mothers Against Drunk Driving have indicated that they do not oppose this legislation. The opposition to this bill is nothing more than a very entrenched, powerful lobby that does not want to see any competition to their monopoly, even if it means screwing consumers over.

This was my favorite quote from the head of the retailers' association:

Just because something's good for other states doesn't mean it's good for ours. Forty-one states have an income tax. Is that reason for us to have one, too?

Oh, snap! A measure to bring in extra revenue for the state from people who would gladly pay the sales tax is JUST like the income tax! Why not compare it to TennCare and gay marriage too? That would hit the Tennessee Boogeyman Trifecta!

The State Senate also deferred a measure that would allow wine to be directly shipped to customers in Nashville, through Internet sales. This one is going to be even harder to pass, because it's even easier to scare people with the underage drinking meme when it comes to ordering off the Internet.

Here's an anecdote though. Last fall, after sampling an excellent Washington State Syrah in my Wines class here at Cornell, I wanted to get a bottle of it for myself. But it came from a small winery that mainly sells to restaurants, and the only way to get it was to order off their website. I ended up getting it a day later than expected. Why? Because UPS came when I wasn't home, and they wouldn't let my roommate sign for it. I had to be there personally, so they could check my ID.

True, there's no way to verify someone's age over the Internet. But UPS and DHL aren't stupid, they're not going to let themselves be implicated in anything illegal.

And neither are the grocery stores.

Monday, March 24, 2008

Duh

That's the only word I have for it:

Using data from a 2002 national survey, researchers found that among more than 1,700 unmarried, heterosexual teens between 15 and 19 years old, those who'd received comprehensive sex ed in school were 60 percent less likely to have been pregnant or gotten someone pregnant than teens who'd had no formal sex education.

Meanwhile, there was no clear benefit from abstinence-only education in preventing pregnancy or delaying sexual intercourse, the researchers report in the Journal of Adolescent Health.

Ignorance about sex will only create another generation of ignorant kids.

Sirius-XM Radio Merger Approved

Woo-hoo!

The Justice Department approved Sirius Satellite Radio’s $5 billion buyout of rival XM Satellite Radio on Monday, saying the deal was unlikely to hurt competition or consumers.

The deal was approved despite opposition from consumer groups and an intense lobbying campaign by the land-based radio industry.

The buyout received shareholder approval in November. The companies said the merger will save hundreds of millions of dollars in operating costs — savings that will ultimately benefit their customers.

This Sirius subscriber is thrilled. Now if they'll just replace "Sirius Left" with Air America from XM, they'll have me as a customer for life.

Now of course, the regular radio industry and even some on the left are already screaming "monopoly!" But it's not. Neither of these companies could have survived on their own. Sirius probably would have eventually gone bankrupt if not for the merger, and you'd still be left with just XM. Under the merger, not only will satellite survive, they'll be able to drop their prices beyond what they charge now. Furthermore, satellite radio is still just a tiny fraction (4% to be exact) of the entire radio industry. Allowing the two to merge will allow satellite as a whole to better compete with land-based radio. This is of course why Clear Channel and other conglomerates are screaming bloody murder.

(On that note...I used to swear that I didn't like country music. But even living in Nashville, I hadn't realized that there are more, and better, types of country music than what's played on the Clear Channel-owned stations here. I don't swear that anymore.)

This merger is great news for consumers, and for artists who will now have an even bigger platform for their music to be heard. The only ones for whom this is a bad thing are the media corporations who strive to have complete control over the radio.

UPDATE: My much more detailed post at DailyKos.

The Superdelegates Are Getting Restless

And it looks like even some of the ones who endorsed Hillary are now beginning to realize it's over.

Via dKos diarist leema, Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey of California, who previously endorsed Hillary Clinton, is planning to announce that she will vote with her district at the convention. The two counties that make up her district, Marin and Sonoma, both went for Obama.

I guess this means that the ultra-progressive anti-war feminist Congresswoman from the Sixth Congressional District of California is now an elitist misogynist determined to hold down other women.

But in broader terms, Woolsey was a very strong Clinton supporter, so this could be the start of a new trend. The superdelegates aren't stupid, they realize that this thing needs to end sooner rather than later. And they know that the candidate who has won the popular vote, the majority of pledged delegates, and the majority of legitimate contests should be the nominee.

Sunday, March 23, 2008

A Real Mensch

Although this Vandy fan loves to trash-talk the Volunteers, I've always held an immense amount of respect for UT men's basketball coach Bruce Pearl. I picked up the Washington Post during my layover in DC en route back to Ithaca back today, and I was amazed to see this article in the sports section.

Bruce Pearl has won over all the dogs and babies in Tennessee, and most of the Christians, too. After just a few minutes of listening to him, it's apparent why the people at this football-crazed university of the deep South have so quickly adopted a chattering, gesticulating, Yankee basketball coach who also happens to be, smothered gasp, Jewish. It would be easier to resist a steam press.


The article goes on to describe how he had to defend himself as a Jew in the racially and politically charged Boston of the 1970s, and the ups and downs of his career, including the Iowa-Illinois debacle.

You know, in this era of steroids and Spygate, it's extremely refreshing to see someone who did the honest thing and was eventually rewarded for it. Pearl was essentially blacklisted from D-I basketball for a decade after turning in Illinois for recruiting violations. But karma always catches up in the end, and Pearl is now the coach of one of the most successful turnarounds in basketball history.

Go read the rest of the article. If you're a UT fan, it should provide extra motivation for the Sweet 16. But the state of Tennessee as a whole is lucky to have him.

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Sissy Israelis

Or so say the right-wing Jews in the U.S.

In a must-read article in Ha'aretz, Bradley breaks down the tension between right-wing diaspora Jews and the Israeli government in the debate over the future of Jerusalem, with the right-wingers essentially calling the Israelis "sissies" for even considering ceding parts of East Jerusalem:


Jews like cosmetics heir Ronald Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress, who took the trouble of personally informing the prime minister last month that Diaspora Jewish opinion must be a factor when it comes to negotiations over Jerusalem's future status.

Yeshiva University rabbinical school head Herschel Schachter, meanwhile, was considerably more direct when addressing the possibility that Israel might make territorial concessions over Jerusalem.

Using the Hebrew words for Jerusalem and the Prime Minister, Schachter was caught on video telling American students at Yeshivat Hakotel, which overlooks both the Western Wall and Al Aqsa:

"If the army is going to give away Yerushalyim, then I would tell everyone to resign from the army - I'd tell them to shoot the Rosh Hamemshalah."


Just to clarify, we're not talking about ceding the Old City here, the part of Jerusalem with the Western Wall and the Temple Mount. We're talking about parts of East Jerusalem, outside the walls, where Jews aren't even allowed into anyway. But I guess to some right-wingers, a few slums where no Jews live are worth assassinating the Prime Minister!

The point being, American Jews know what's best for Israel, even though we don't live there. This quote has got to be one of the most patronizing things I've ever read in my life:

During a recent Jerusalem meeting of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, Boston real-estate developer Joshua Katzen was quoted as saying that Diaspora Jews can see the bigger security-diplomatic picture that Israelis sometimes miss.

"They lose sight of the wider jihad in the world," said Katzen, former chair of the rightist CAMERA media advocacy group and a board member of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs whose advisors include John Bolton and Richard Perle.


Pray tell, how does a rich guy in Boston have a better view of the "wider jhad" than an ordinary Israeli? The ordinary Israeli, mind you, has to live with the daily threat of rocket attacks and suicide bombings. The worst thing the rich guy in Boston has to worry about is having a heart attack from too much clam chowder (unless he's Orthodox, in which case he wouldn't eat the chowder but would still have to worry about THE GAYS).

Likudniks point out that their left-wing critics in the diaspora can't tell Israelis what to do, since we're not the ones facing the security threats. But as this article points out, neither do right-wing diaspora Jews. Besides, if there is any threat of Jerusalem losing it's Jewish character, it will happen well before the city is divided. Jews are being driven out of the city as we speak due to skyrocketing housing costs and a bleak job market. Those problems are just as big a threat to the Jews of Jerusalem, and it's too bad the right-wingers who claim to love Jerusalem can't pay a little more attention to them.

Lugo Out Of Democratic Primary

Chris Lugo just posted a diary on DailyKos announcing his intention to withdraw from the Democratic primary to run as an independent or a Green instead.

(crickets)

On a more important note, I will admit that as much as I like Bob Tuke, the more I hear from Mike Padgett the more I like him too. I'll just chalk that up to being Nashville-centrist. A tough Democrat in East Tennessee is certainly appealing from an electability standpoint. And I REALLY like his website.

Friday, March 21, 2008

Esther And Vashti

Tonight I went to Purim services at my temple in Nashville for the first time in a long time (Purim was technically yesterday, but hey, we're Reform, we celebrate the holidays on Shabbat so that we get it all done in one service!). Purim really isn't a major holiday, but it's still very festive. At my temple, the services are geared more towards the kids--they come in costume and get candy (but when I was their age, we had to earn the candy by answering the rabbi's quiz questions about the Purim story. Kids these days get everything handed to them!).

But one thing that often gets overlooked in the Purim story is the feminist message of the Megillah. Yeah I know, I can't be a feminist because I don't support Hillary, and this isn't really a feminist issue because it has nothing to do with the White Male Media Conspiracy Against Hillary, but it's still an important point. At least I think so, you may still think it the mad ramblings of a Birkenstock-wearing latte-sipping elitist.

There are two women in the story. The first wife of King Ahasuerus was Queen Vashti. After a week-long party, the drunk king demanded she come before him and his guests wearing the royal crown, and nothing else. She refused, and was banished.

Ahasuerus took another wife, the beautiful (and Jewish) Esther. Esther uses her beauty and wiles to charm the king, and to convince him to spare the Jewish people against Haman's plot to kill them.

All of the little girls who come dressed up to Purim services want to be Esther. She is the hero, after all. Vashti is just a marginal character, and a disrespectful one at that.

But recent interpretations of the text paint a very different picture of the first queen. Vashti was a feminist! She refused to debase herself, to be a sex object for a bunch of drunk men, no matter how powerful they were. Esther has no qualms about using sex to get her way, while Vashti demands respect and honor.

On the other hand, Esther's role is not so simple to pin down either. It's true that she may not be the "classical feminist" that Vashti was. But the Megillah notes that she went before the king without being summoned, and that the penalty for doing so was death. It took her three days of praying to build up the courage to go before him. It may seem like a small thing, but it shows that she was willing to risk everything for what she believed in. Esther and Vashti both did something radical for women of that time--they took their lives and their fates into their own hands. And that cannot be dismissed.

So what's my point? Feminists have got to stop swiping at each other if we hope to continue on the gains of the previous generations. Supporting a particular candidate, dressing a certain way, having a certain set of interests...none of those things make you a feminist. When I went to the March For Women's Lives in 2004, people kept yelling "What does a feminist look like?" for the rest of us to respond "This is what a feminist looks like!" Anyone can be a feminist, so long as they believe in a woman's right to take her fate into her own hands.

That's all it is.

Gold And Black And Blue

I'm not even going to attempt to spin or defend this one. Vanderbilt was handed the best chance they've had in a long time to go far in the Big Dance, and they blew it.

It's not like Siena is a Gonzaga-like mid-major powerhouse. For God's sake, Cornell beat them.

But powerhouse or not, it became clear pretty early on that Vanderbilt looked past them. We played sloppy, we didn't rebound, and we took stupid shots. Meanwhile, Siena didn't seem to miss a single basket.

Vanderbilt's critics have pointed to our seeming inability to win on the road against quality opponents. And unfortunately, Vandy just proved them right, in a big way.

Next year is going to be painful with the loss of Shan Foster and Red Gordon. A.J. Ogilvy could be great, but he's not there yet.

So now my team and my brackets are out the window. Go Memphis, I guess!

Richardson Endorses Obama (For Real This Time)

Congratulations Governor Richardson, on joining the misogynistic elitist white male patriarchy with your endorsement of Obama! It's not because you think that the nomination should go to the candidate who will have the most pledged delegates, the most primaries won, and the lead in the pledged delegates; no, you're just sexist!

I totally called it a few weeks ago.

There's The Rub

Leon Wieseltier of The New Republic:

With the exception of George H.W. Bush, I have heard every president in my lifetime lauded by American Jews as "the best friend Israel ever had," and I have heard every one of them, even Ronald Reagan, denounced as a pawn of the peace process. This Jewish need to believe in the friendship of the highest power in the land is a survival of the political mentality of medieval Jewry, with its preference for "vertical alliances" over any reliance upon the goodwill of the local population--a highly anomalous survival in the American case, in which horizontal alliances, at every level of politics, are a regular feature of Jewish existence. But the reassuring truth is that every president in my lifetime has pursued more or less the same policy toward Israel, according to which Israeli security is to be regarded (in Obama's fine word) as "sacrosanct," and a Palestinian state is to be created out of the occupied territories, and Israeli settlement of the territories is to be discouraged, and a concord of pro-American Arab states is to be encouraged, and so on--in sum, partition, a special relationship, peace, a regional alliance. There have been tonal differences, to be sure, and all these elements may finally not go together--but this is the tradition, and I do not imagine that Obama will deviate from it, or Clinton, or McCain. September 11 drew the United States into a new and deep and justified engagement with the Arab world, and American Jews will have to accustom themselves to this historical complication--but hold the kaddish, because in American presidential politics now there is not an enemy in sight.

And there's the rub. Some of you may not like his tone on the issue, some of you may not like his middle name, but there's no question that he will be a friend to Israel. American policy towards Israel will not change under an Obama administration. What will change is the way we deal with the Arab world, and it will be a change for the wiser.

This was a great article, I would highly recommend it. This was my favorite part:

As for Obama's notorious middle name: it is the rankest Islamophobia to suggest that all Husseins are the same. I run into Islamophobia in the Jewish community rather often. It is unpretty and it is un-Judaic. Barack Hussein Obama is as splendid a name for a patriotic American as, say, Abner Mikva.


And I can guarantee you that Abner Mikva would have just as many problems with people calling his name into question as Barack Hussein Obama does now. If the Republicans don't like "Hussein", wait until they find out what a "mikva" is used for!

Bill Clinton And Jeremiah Wright

(H/t slinkerwink on DailyKos)

You knew this was coming.



At the height of the Lewinsky scandal, Bill Clinton held a breakfast for religious leaders at the White House. According to the records, the First Lady was also in attendance.

So can we now infer from this that Bill and Hillary share Reverend Wright's views? Can we demand that they repudiate him entirely, and if they don't then can we say that they want to kill Whitey? Can we go spread that meme throughout the media? Can we now tell the superdelegates that such a connection will kill the Democrats in November?

No, of course not. That would be classless, undignified, and just plain wrong.

But here's something to consider. As much as the Clintons now love to use Wright to bash Obama, they had no problem soliciting his help when they were caught in a scandal. I've seen nothing to indicate that his views were completely different 10 years ago. So perhaps they don't share Wright's views (as far as we know, we'll take them at their word that they don't), but they certainly have no problem using someone like him for a political gain and then throwing him under the bus when it's no longer expedient.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Hillary Clinton On The Xavier-Georgia Game

Bill and I would like to congratulate the Xavier University Musketeers on defeating the University of Georgia Bulldogs in the first round of the NCAA Tournament.

The Bulldogs had everyone thinking they would be a Cinderella team, but let me make this perfectly clear--they did not deserve to be in the Big Dance in the first place. With only two seniors on their entire roster, it is evident that they did not have the experience necessary to be an NCAA team. The fact that they went 17-16 in the regular season only underscores that point.

Now, you may be wondering about the SEC Tournament. They did win the tournament, and did so by playing three games in 24 hours. However, they were only able to win those games because they were all essentially home games. Home games are unfair, elitist, and only disenfranchise the visiting team's fans. Had this game been played in Florida, it would have been a lot more fair. The SEC must stop disenfranchising the Gators.

(And for the record, a home game is still not elitist if it's a Vanderbilt home game. Sort of like how caucuses are fair unless we lose them)

Finally, we would like for everyone to remember that Xavier is far more significant than Georgia in the general election. For one thing, they are located in the hard working town of Cincinatti, in the crucial state of Ohio. UGA is located in the latte-sipping college town of Athens, in the solid red state of Georgia. Oh, and they have a lot more African-Americans, who are also irrelevant to the general election.

In conclusion, although we're sure that Georgia coach Dennis Felton made some very inspirational speeches to his players, the fact remains that the more important team won this contest.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Cry Me A River

Stacey Campfield is upset today that his bill to allow students to carry concealed weapons on college campuses failed a House committee vote:

In the wake of the recent deadly campus shootings, Rep. Stacy Campfield proposed a bill to allow concealed weapons on campus. The bill would allow permit-holding students and staff to carry concealed guns in their backpacks or briefcases.

Campfield said it would take the power away from school shooters and put it back in the hands of the innocent.


The campus police say they're against it because it makes it impossible to tell the criminals and the innocent apart, but obviously they're just pansy lib'ruls who are against the Second Amendment.

I wonder how The Rep might have handled this situation, one that happened only weeks after the NIU shootings?

Authorities responded Thursday morning to a report of a person with a gun, which turned out to be an Reserve Officers' Training Corps drill rifle, on the campus of Cal State-Dominguez Hills in Carson.


What might have happened here? A student recently allowed to carry a gun on campus might have seen the ROTC guy with his fake rifle and panicked. Shoot first, ask questions later. That would have shown 'em!

I'm glad to see the legislature act sensibly with regards to gun issues for once. This legislation wouldn't stop school shootings and would only have created the conditions for more needless tragedy.

Abe Lincoln Hates America!

Here's one of the funniest things I've read in a long time, what might have happened if Ann Coulter had liveblogged the Gettysburg Address. A snippet:

a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Ahhh...now he slips it to us! "Fourscore and seven," indeed! He's bringing us back to the Marxist rant of 1776, completely ignoring the Constitution of 1787 in rhetoric as he has in practice. I'll believe we're all equal when I'm as tall as Lincoln, or as ugly. And the slaves he's so fond of may be his equals, but I'm damned if they're mine.


Hilarious stuff. Go read the rest.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Announcing The 2008 TN Liberal Bloggers Bracket Contest!

UPDATE: If the link to the group below doesn't work, try this one.

I alluded to this a few weeks ago, but I've set up a "TN Liberal Bloggers" bracket group on Yahoo for the NCAA Tournament, and you're all invited to join!

Here is the link to the group. Shoot me an email (goldni386 at gmail) or a message on here for the password (I picked one you'll ALL remember).

This is an extremely exciting tourney for Tennessee, with five teams (Memphis, Tennessee, Vanderbilt, Belmont, and Austin Peay) making tournament appearances. Perhaps I-40 is the new "Tobacco Road"!

Here's how I see this playing out. I have Memphis in the championship game, falling to UNC. Tennessee also loses to UNC, in the Elite 8. Belmont and Austin Peay will both lose in the first round.

Which brings us to Vanderbilt. This may be wishful thinking as a Vandy fan, but I think we have a path to the Final 4. We'll beat Siena, then the winner of the Clemson-'Nova game (which could honestly go either way). Then we'll beat Kansas. Yes, they are a #1 seed, but if there's one consistency from year to year in the NCAA tourney, it's that Kansas always chokes! Then Vandy would play Georgetown in the Elite 8. As you may recall, Vandy rightfully beat Georgetown in the Sweet 16 last year. The only reason it's recorded as a loss is because Jeff Green of Georgetown so blatantly walked on the last play and the refs didn't call it. Anyway, I have Vandy in the Final 4 in my bracket.

My other picks...George Mason in the Sweet 16, and Temple and Davidson both pull off first-round upsets. Part of me wants to pick Winthrop over Wazzou, but I'm not sure.

ANYWAY, I hope you'll all play along. We need something to take our minds off of this primary madness, and what better way to do that than through a little March Madness

Sunday, March 16, 2008

Programming Update, 3-16-08

I'll be out for a few days. I'm going up to St. Louis tomorrow morning to see Wash U and to start getting an idea of the housing situation, and I'm not taking my computer for such a short trip.

But I really do need a break. The entire delegate selection process has left me very disappointed, and actually rather disgusted (more about this once I get my thoughts together, but needless to say I'm not going to Denver in August). Add that to the loss of Volunteer Voters and the never-ending primary season, and you can see why I'd really rather not talk about politics right now.

I can't afford to get burnt out on this right now. Other kids are good at sports or the arts, but politics is my "niche." It's what I know, and I understand it better than most of the general population. So I need to take a break before the one thing I'm good at becomes the one thing I can't stand.

And by "take a break," I mean I'll be back by mid-week. I can't leave it.

Say I'm Not #2!

We're screwed:


The U.S. economy lost the title of "world's biggest" to the euro zone this week as the value of the dollar slumped in currency markets.

Taking the gross domestic product of both economies in 2007, the combined GDP of the 15 countries which use the euro overtook that of the United States when the European currency surged to a record high of more than $1.56 per euro.

Here's the thing--the dollar has not hit rock-bottom yet. We don't know how low it's going to sink against the euro in the end. It's happened so rapidly--it was roughly $1.43 to the euro when I was over there last year (which of course didn't seem that bad compared to the $2 per pound sterling in the UK). And don't forget, by all indicators the euro zone is far more stable than the U.S. economy right now. The slump in the dollar's worth is only starting.

To any of my friends in the UK and Europe...I really hope you're all planning trips to come over here and visit me. Y'all will be able to live like royalty here for only a few quid per day.

Friday, March 14, 2008

I Think That She Knows

Nancy Pelosi:

"If the votes of the superdelegates overturn what's happened in the elections," said Pelosi, "it would be harmful to the Democratic Party."

Although Pelosi offered her assessment without directly referencing Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., her comments lend considerable support to the Illinois Democrat.


Obviously, she can't come right out and say who she supports, nor do I expect her to. It wouldn't be appropriate in her position.

But this is where that "stewards of the party" bit comes in. As a member of the Democratic leadership, she knows that allowing the superdelegates to overturn the pledged delegates would be the kiss of death for the Democratic Party. And as a "steward of the party", it's her job not to let that happen.

In Memoriam

Today the Tennessee blogosphere lost it's one indispensible element, Volunteer Voters. The site that brought together left, right, and every other viewpoint has fallen victim to budget cuts, along with the King of Aggregators, Adam Kleinheider.

I wouldn't be getting 100+ hits a day here if not for Volunteer Voters. I would pretty much just be talking to myself here if Kleinheider hadn't helped me out when I first started this thing back in July. I owe him a lot, and I hope to see him kicking ass once again at his own site.

And how Bill Hobbs still has a job and ACK doesn't is beyond me.

Coming Home

I'm sitting in the Syracuse airport right now, waiting to fly back to Nashville for spring break. There's a huge commotion at one of the gates right now because several soldiers returning from Iraq are about to step off the plane, and all of their families are waiting for them.

I'm writing this now because when they do actually get off the plane and reunite with their families, I'll be crying too hard to see my computer.

It's such a joyous moment, but heartbreaking to wonder if they might have to go back.

The Democrats in Congress refuse to stand up to this President. Senator Obama or Senator Clinton....please end this war. Do not make that adorable little girl in the red and white dress sitting across from me go another day without her daddy.

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Is It Really That Much Fun?

State Senator Doug Jackson of Dickson, TN, is on the Colbert Report right now, explaining why guns should be allowed in bars. They interviewed several informed bar-hopping citizens, who proclaimed that allowing guns in bars will "stop the terrorists" and would be fun "because you could shoot stuff." I'll put the video up when I can get it, but that might not be until the morning.

UPDATE: Here's the video:



My four-year attempt to convince the New Yorkers that not all Tennesseans are dumb rednecks has officially been set back to freshmen year.

I think it confirms what Jeff Foxworthy once said..."Southerners are as smart as anyone in this country. Our only problem is that we just can't keep the most ignorant amongst us off the television."

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Keith Olbermann Special Comment On Hillary Clinton

The video...



...and the transcript.

Now, I'm sure the Clinton supporters will be quick to label him as an Obama hack. But watch the video. This was clearly painful for him to do. And although I would say that she is ultimately responsible for everything that comes out of her campaign, Olbermann is correct in noting that it's her advisors--Mark Penn, Howard Wolfson, Harold Ickes--are dragging everyone down.

Laura Bush For President

Here's a funny Facebook group you can join.

Hillary Clinton's "experience" argument rests in part on the crises that occurred when she was in the White House. By that logic, Laura Bush is imminently qualified to be President--she lived in the White House through 9/11, the Iraq War, and Hurricane Katrina.

And hey, Tennessee Guerilla Whiners...electing an "experienced" white woman would amount to a rejection of the patriarchy, would it not?

Stewards Of The Party

In trying to justify a possible attempt by Clinton superdelegates to overturn the will of the Democratic electorate and the pledged delegates at the Democratic National Convention, former DNC chairman Steven Grossman used a curious phrase:


...our party concluded that we had demonstrated the ability to act as stewards of the national party--and of the national interest. By dint of our experience in the community and our public service, we were adjudged fit to fulfill a moral responsibility to act in the best interest of the country as we saw it--
If you read the rest of the e-mail, it's nothing more than a collection of Hillary talking points. But in a way, he does have a point about how the superdelegates can act as "stewards of the party." The Democratic leadership obviously has an interest in doing what's best for their party.

That's why it's time for some of them to step up.

I'm looking at you, Al Gore and John Edwards. Bill Richardson too. It's been laid completely bare for the world to see that we have one candidate who is engaged in the ugliest form of race-baiting, one who has ridiculed most of the country (including several states that are absolutely winnable for the Democrats in November), one who will have no problem bringing down the rest of the party to get her way.

There may have been a time when Democrats engaged in racially charged, "they're stealing everything from us!", dog-whistle campaigning:



But that time is long past.

And so, if you really are stewards of the party, it's time for you to stand up and say, in no uncertain terms, that what Hillary and her advisors are doing is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

There is no reason why the Democrats should lose this election. We're following one of the worst Presidents in history, and the best the Republicans can do is someone who cannot unite their base. But if Hillary is allowed to persist, then we are essentially snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

I'm looking at you in particular, John Edwards. As a Southerner, you should understand damn well what's going on here. And if the "Two Americas" bit wasn't just some nice campaign rhetoric, then you need to take a stand against it. You could put an end to it.

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

This One's For North Carolina

SurveyUSA has a new poll out on the North Carolina primary, taking place on May 6.

In a Democratic Primary in North Carolina today, 03/11/08, eight weeks to the vote, Barack Obama leads Hillary Clinton 49% to 41%, according to a SurveyUSA poll conducted exclusively for WTVD-TV Raleigh. Compared to an identical SurveyUSA poll released one month ago, before Obama won Virginia, Maryland, and Wisconsin, and before Clinton won Texas and Ohio, the contest in NC is largely unchanged. Then, Obama led by 10, now by 8. In Charlotte, Obama led by 2 points a month ago, by 7 points today. In Southern and Eastern NC, Obama led by 4 points a month ago, by 8 points today. Only in Raleigh and Greensboro did Clinton slice into Obama, trimming his lead from 16 points a month ago to 8 points today. Among women, Obama and Clinton are effectively even, as they were last month. Among men, Obama leads by 13. Clinton leads 5:3 among whites. Obama leads 5:1 among blacks. Obama leads among voters under age 50. The two are tied among voters age 50+.


It cannot be stressed how significant it is that he's leading in ALL of these regions. If these numbers hold until the primary, that should effectively end any debate about whether or not he appeals to rural whites.

Two more important stats...Hillary and Obama are effectively tied among voters who describe themselves as "moderate" Democrats" but Obama has commanding leads among "conservative" and "liberal" Democrats. Also, although Hillary leads among white Hispanic voters, it is significant that he commands a higher percentage of Hispanic voters than whites. Granted, Hispanics do not make up that large a portion of the North Carolina electorate (although more than you might think--the number of Hispanics in the Asheville area has skyrocketed in the last decade), but if he could pull 42% of that vote in the primary, that would be huge.

Fire Up The TiVo!

Keith Olbermann, my generation's Edward R. Murrow, will be giving one of his famous "Special Comments" on his show tomorrow night, regarding Hillary Clinton's campaign tactics.

I've got the details here.

Make it two nights in a row that I'll be TiVo-ing American Idol (and yes, I watch it. Sue me) to watch MSNBC instead.

When You're In A Hole, Stop Digging!

Because at this rate, Geraldine Ferraro is going to dig the Clinton campaign six feet under.

We've all heard about the original remark:


"If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept."


On the one hand, it's true. If he were a white man, he'd already be the nominee and Hillary would just be the junior Senator from New York. Hillary, of course, would not be in her position if her last name wasn't "Clinton". But this statement is the ultimate irony, coming from someone who was nominated for the VP slot in 1984 SOLELY because she was a woman.

She was called out on those remarks. And what does she do? Accuse the responders of counter-racism:

"Any time anybody does anything that in any way pulls this campaign down and says let's address reality and the problems we're facing in this world, you're accused of being racist, so you have to shut up," Ferraro said. "Racism works in two different directions. I really think they're attacking me because I'm white. How's that?"


Uh, no. They're attacking you because it was a really stupid thing to say.

And then she has the NERVE to say that it's Obama's campaign manager David Axelrod who's making it into a racial issue:

"He knows damn well that the best thing to do in a situation like this is to come back and hit with race"

I beg your pardon? You were the one who tried to "hit with race" in the first place!

Geraldine Ferraro, you are nothing more than a political has-been who's race-baiting in an attempt to keep yourself relevant. Unfortunately, you haven't been relevant since sometime in the 1980s.

You know what? I hope the Clintons keep her on. They're expressed their disagreement, but have by no means made any attempt to reject or denounce the comments. So if it's not a big deal to them, then I think they ought to send Ms. Ferraro up to Philadelphia to repeat it. Then they should send her to Raleigh-Durham to repeat it again.

Please do that!

A Well-Deserved Honor

Vanderbilt fans are long used to our team and our players getting absolutely no respect. So it's nice to see the sports world throw us an occasional bone:

Shan Foster, the all-time leading scorer in Vanderbilt history, has been named the Southeastern Conference's Player of the Year by a vote of the league's coaches that was announced Tuesday morning.

**************

Foster, the 6-feet, 6-inch Commodore senior wing, who also ranks as the school's all-time leading 3-point shooter, led the SEC in scoring during the regular season with a 20.6-point average. He scored 20 points or more in 18 of Vanderbilt's 31 games, including a 42-point outburst in the team's March 5 overtime win against Mississippi State that topped all conference players. Foster was the only multiple SEC Player of the Week honoree this season, receiving that recognition on four different occasions.


Shan is an all-around threat. He can burn you on the inside but also makes shooting 3's look easy. He will be sorely missed next season.

Next up....first-round pick in the 2008 NBA Draft!

Monday, March 10, 2008

Hammer, Nail, Head

Johnny DuPree, mayor of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, on Hillary's derogotary comments about his state:


"It's that kind of dismissive attitude toward the South that has led Democrats, independents and Republicans in the South who are opposed to the Iraq war, or who agree that we should cut taxes for working families, to feel unwelcome in the Democratic Party," DuPree said. "The last thing Mississippi Democrats need is to be told that once again, our state won't matter in a general election. Mississippi is the next primary, and she owes voters here an explanation for her comments."


It's this sort of attitude that perfectly sums up why Hillary should not be the Democratic nominee. If Democrats in red states are constantly being told they don't matter, then why should they vote for the candidate who told them that?

On SpitzerGate

I know I'm a couple of hours behind everyone else on this, I was in class/at the gym when all of this broke. But being in New York, this was all anyone was talking about.

I just want to say that Eliot Spitzer is probably second only to Harold Ford in terms of politicians for whom I had such high hopes only to be thoroughly let down. The whole thing just really saddens me. I honestly believed that he could have been the first Jewish president. He was an unapologetic progressive who could have fired up the base, while still having crossover appeal with his "tough on crime and corruption" reputation. He could have gone so much further than Joe Lieberman. But now it's all ruined. His downfall started when he wasted all of his political capital on the immigrant driver's license plan (which wasn't such a bad idea but he should have known it would get that kind of reaction), and the sex scandal pretty much puts the nail in the coffin. He pretty much has no choice now but to step down.

I don't mean any offense to anyone from New York who may be reading this, but this is sort of emblematic of your politics up here. The more you try to fight against the corruption, the more you get caught up in it. I know he's not my governor, but it definitely makes me sad.

Make Up Your Minds

Clinton strategist Mark Penn:

“Independent and Republican support is diminishing as they find out he’s the most liberal Democratic senator… As they get more of a sense that he’s not ready to be Commander-in-Chief, a lot of Independents who were supporting him are disappearing.”


Hillary people--please make up your minds. Is Obama "not a real Democrat" because he commands Independent and Republican support, or is he too liberal and therefore losing that support?

And if this were true (which it's not), and Hillary were to start gathering more Republican and Independent votes, then wouldn't her future wins not count because they didn't comprise SOLELY of registered Democrats?

(H/t Jim Maynard, because the Tennessee Guerilla Whiners banned him)

Southern Hospitality

A while back, I described taking a taxi ride in Chicago, and how upon hearing I was from Nashville, the driver told me that the song playing on the radio was "our country music in Ethiopia!" It was living proof of how much Nashville's international "brand" has grown.

But now it seems that the opposite situation may soon occur in Nashville. The Transportation Licensing Commission wants to overhaul the English-language test given to cabbies in Nashville:

Brian McQuistion, the commission's director, said some drivers learn enough to pass the test, but not enough to sustain a conversation with their passengers.

"We get a lot of complaints about drivers who don't talk to the passengers or don't seem to understand, or are constantly on their cell phones" speaking another language, McQuistion said.

He said drivers often make such calls to get directions to a passenger's destination, which keeps them from getting lost. But the lack of attention to their customers can give Music City visitors who are fresh off the airplane a bad first impression.

Butch Spyridon, president of the Nashville Convention & Visitors Bureau, which teaches a mandatory hospitality class for drivers, said too many of them are rude, uncaring and inattentive.

"It's about maximizing the visitor experience and economic opportunity for the drivers and the city," Spyridon said. "They're the front door to the city.

First of all, has it occurred to anyone that if the problem is that drivers are inattentive, then maybe they need to do a better job with that hospitality class? It's possible to still be an attentive driver even if your English isn't perfect. Wouldn't that be a more sensible option, at least in the short-term?

Secondly, if you've ever been to New York City, you know that most of the cabbies there barely speak any English. But they don't need to, because they know their way around the city and more importantly, they usually know how to avoid the traffic jams. As long as they understand "Saks" and "Bloomingdale's", that's good enough for me. Now, I understand that Nashville is very different from NYC, and we want to promote the "Southern hospitality" image. But again, if that's their aim, it seems you could do it more effectively by improving the hospitality class and doing a better job of stressing that image. Simply saying "The drivers need to learn how to better speak English" isn't going to solve the root of the problem. It's not the drivers' job to be tour guides, but it is the Convention and Visitors Bureau's job to teach them how to be attentive drivers.

Finally, if their ultimate goal is to have a "first-class taxi system," then wouldn't the $32,000 be better spent by making it easier to get a taxi in the first place? It takes forever if you're not either at the airport or downtown.

But it wouldn't be Tennessee if we didn't look at a problem and immediately blame the immigrants, no matter the issue!

Anti-Semites For Hillary

You thought Farrakhan was bad? Take a look at this:

The Clinton campaign is no longer taking contributions from a Turkish American who financed a film that depicted an American Jew trading in Iraqi body parts.

Mehmet Celebi had been listed on the presidential campaign website of U.S. Sen. Hilalry Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) as a "Hill-raiser," someone who had raised more than $100,000 for her presidential bid. Celebi had co-produced "Valley of the Wolves: Iraq," a 2006 film based on a popular Turkish TV series about a crack Turkish combat unit.

The film depicts a Jewish American doctor harvesting organs from prisoners.


Wow! That's pretty damn anti-Semitic, wouldn't you say?

And according to Marc Ambinder, the campaign was contacted about this by the New York Post a whole month ago, but declined comment.

Here's the difference--Farrakhan may have said he endorsed Obama, but he has never been on the inside of the Obama campaign or anywhere near Obama's circle. This Celebi guy was a top fundraiser, very much a campaign insider.

It's not enough for Hillary to say that she's not going to accept contributions from him anymore. She needs to return the money, and I demand that she denounce AND reject him!

I doubt this story will get much coverage. If this guy had raised mney for Obama, the media would raise holy hell. But it's almost as if we expect the Clintons to be involved with dodgy characters and dirty money, so there's no need to bring it up.

Saturday, March 8, 2008

Does The Jewish Vote Even Matter?

Short answer: No, not as much as everyone seems to think.

From the Jerusalem Post:


While Jews today represent less than 2% of the total US population, traditionally they have had an electoral impact well beyond that because of their high turnout, and their concentration in certain large states - in particular New York, New Jersey, California and Florida, where well more than half of US Jews live.

Unfortunately, this particular geographic dispersion has worked to the disadvantage of the Jewish vote thanks to the Red State/Blue State pattern evident in recent presidential ballots.

The first three states cited above are all well within the Democratic/Blue State Camp. And Jews are not in fact particularly well represented in those places now seen as key "swing states" in national elections, such as Ohio, Iowa, Missouri, Colorado or the "New South" states of Virginia and the Carolinas.

That leaves Florida, which certainly was the key swing state in 2000. However, that state's Jewish voters still did not succeed in turning the tide for a Democratic presidential contender [Al Gore] with both solid Jewish support and the added benefit of the first Jewish running mate [Joe Lieberman] in US history, and it's unlikely Florida will be that much of a factor this November.

In fact, the only state where the "Jewish vote" could play a role is in the Pennsylvania primary on April 22. How much of a role they'd play is debateable, given how PA Jews are largely concentrated in Philadelphia.

The media and the Republicans have been jumping all over Obama's middle name and the Farrakhan flap because it makes for a good story, a good talking point. But ultimately, Jews are too concentrated in certain areas to be a decisive voting bloc in presidential elections.

However, it is nice to know that at least one facet of my identity hasn't been written off by the Clintons as "insignificant." The student from a red-state already has.

If Hillary Clinton Were A Vanderbilt Fan

Wherein I attempt to justify Vanderbilt's inability to win on the road by using Hillary Clinton logic:

Vanderbilt's opponents have claimed that our recent SEC road losses have raised doubts about our ability to win in the NCAA Tournament against non-conference teams, especially in a weak SEC year, and about whether we will still hold appeal to the NCAA Selection Committee once the SEC tournament is finished.

But Vanderbilt has won every game this season where it matters, at home. Our home court provides a much better representation of our abilities as a team. It allows our hard-working fans to truly come out and support their team. Vanderbilt students work hard in all of their classes, and don't have the luxury of following their team around to all their road games in RVs, as fans of less academically-challenging universities might. Road games also raise the spectre of biased referees who are determined to hold Vanderbilt down. Road games, as you can see, are sexist and elitist. Our hard-working and fair home court is where it matters.

And in facst, every team to which Vanderbilt has lost is insignificant for the Big Dance. Let me explain why:

Kentucky: This was a loss in overtime, which in other sports is still counted as a tie in the official standings. We should still receive delegates for this loss. Kentucky, however, proved their insignificance a few weeks later when we whipped them by 40 points at home.

Tennessee: Now, you may be wondering why a likely #1-seed team is considered insignificant. Well, we never expected to win this game. Bruce Pearl and his orange chest distracted the fans from looking at the real issues, and UT won just on emotional appeal. However, our beating of Tennessee at home when they first got the #1 ranking was completely fair, and seeing the big difference in the teams' rankings in that game, the Vanderbilt home game should be taken into account more than the away game by the Selection Committee.

Florida: It is imperative that the Florida game be re-done. Our fans were clearly disenfranchised here. The second Florida game, at Vanderbilt, was done much more fairly and the NCAA Selection Committee must accept these results.

Ole Miss: Ole Miss is going to need a deep SEC Tournament run to get into the NCAAs. Besides, Vanderbilt beat Mississippi State, which counts more because they have a better record.

Arkansas: That referee who refused to give us an extra timeout was simply disenfranchising Kevin Stallings.

Alabama: Alabama has absolutely no chance of making the NCAA Tournament. We lost to them after already securing our seeding in the SEC Tournament. This loss therefore does not matter.

Now, we will go onto the SEC Tournament. And if we don't win there, we'll just have our superdelegate boosters speak with the Selection Committee about what is in the best interests of college basketball.

*******************************

Of course, if a college basketball team were to use this line of logic to excuse some of their losses, they'd be laughed at. So why do we allow a candidate for the leader of the free world to get away with it?

A Mail-Order Primary?

Senator Bill Nelson of Florida has raised an intriguing possibility of how a re-vote in his state's primary might take place:


Dan McLaughlin, a spokesman for Senator Nelson, tells NEWSWEEK that the beginning of a new model for Florida's primary vote came into focus earlier this week with a conversation between Nelson and Crist in which they agreed on three common points. First, that a revote was in order. Second, that the second primary should be conducted via mail-in balloting. Finally, both agreed that Floridians should not pay the tab. As Crist went out to praise these three common principles in public, McLaughlin says Nelson approached Dean, who in turn sought counsel from the DNC's lawyers as to how soft money might be raised for the mail-in primary. McLaughlin says Dean responded to Nelson's camp Friday with news that the DNC's legal counsel had determined that the state party in Florida could raise soft money. "There is some form, some shape coming into the cross-hairs, so to speak," McLaughlin says. "Now there's consensus on a revote, on mail-in balloting and on fund-raising."

At first blush, doing a mail-in vote seems nuts. Given Florida's history with counting ballots, I don't know how much they can be trusted to get this right. And it should be noted that Bill Nelson is a Hillary supporter.

On the other hand, this does raise some interesting possibilities. First, this answers Hillary's complaint that "caucuses are undemocratic" (which of course was not their argument until they started losing them). Their argument is that it's easier to go to the polls and vote when you want (because their supporters work, while ALL Obama supporters just sit around sipping lattes). Well, if your supporters have time to stop at the polls and vote, then you can't argue they don't have the time to fill out a sheet of paper and stick it in the mailbox. A mail-in vote would be even less time-consuming than a regular primary vote.

Which is why it's interesting that Bill Nelson is the one who's pushing this plan. As a Hillary supporter, he should be pushing for the tainted primary votes to count, regardless of the rules. Hillary herself is certainly calling for those delegates to be seated unconditionally. But Nelson is proposing a plan that could actually benefit her, so this certainly puts her in a tight spot.

I could also see this helping Obama. His ground operation would be uniquely positioned to make sure all of their supporters get their ballots, know how to fill them out, and mail them in. And if he were actually given a chance to campaign in Florida, which he didn't do the first time around (because he actually, you know, followed the rules), I'm convinced that the results would be much closer than they were.

Meanwhile, it seems that Michigan is going to go with a caucus, as was originally planned. The polls indicate that Obama certainly could win in a re-vote. Bear in mind, she was only able to pull 55% against "uncommitted" the first time around. So let's go ahead and do re-votes, so that no one can claim they've been "disenfranchinsed".

But if the Clintons are opposed to that, and want the first results to be accepted unconditionally, then perhaps we need to look at who's really disenfranchinsing Florida and Michigan.

UPDATE: I do want to clarify that I'm not 100% sold on this, I just think it's an intriguing possibility. I don't trust Florida to get this right. But if they come up with a plan that gets DNC approval, I'll support it.

Friday, March 7, 2008

You Know It'll Just Flurry!

The TNDP has postponed it's executive committee meeting until next weekend:

The Executive Committee meeting of the Tennessee Democratic Party has been postponed due to inclement weather occurring in portions of Tennessee. Instead, the committee will reconvene one week from the original date on Saturday March 15th, 2008.


The meeting will now take place on the 15th at 9 a.m. Central Time, at the State House chamber in Nashville.

While I'm upset that I have to wait another week to find out if I get to be an at-large delegate (and I'll especially be upset if Nashville doesn't get a lot of snow in the end), I am glad that the meeting will now take place when I'm home, on spring break. I'll get to personally ask people to vote for me!

Freak Out

I do wonder what I did with my old # 90 jersey:

The Titans and defensive end Jevon Kearse agreed to terms Thursday on a two-year deal for $6 million, with a $1.3 million signing bonus.

It brings the nine-year veteran back to the scene of his greatest success — he was NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year in 1999 and went to the Pro Bowl three times in five seasons with the Titans.

Now, we all know how sensational of a player he is when he's healthy. We also know that "when he's healthy" is a pretty big conditional.

Ultimately though, I think this is a good deal. We got him fairly cheap, when you consider how much the Eagles signed him for back in 2004. He's a fan favorite, and he'll be great in the locker room. Hopefully, coming back to the place where he had such success will help him regain that spark. Having Kearse rushing from one side and Kyle Vanden Bosch from the other would create an explosive pass-rush defense.

But the Titans need to get someone else on the left side. Kearse's injuries are well-documented, and even if healthy he'll still have to be rotated in and out at his age. Neither Antwan Odom nor Travis LaBoy lived up to expectations, but they worked as a rotating system. KVB can't do this all on his own; they need to get one more defensive end.

We also need another WR. And please God, not Justin McCareins.

Is Hillary A Muslim?

She's not, as far as we know. I'll take her at her word that she's not:

Thursday, March 6, 2008

Who Is Monica In This Analogy?

Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson today compared Barack Obama to Kenneth Starr:

"When Sen. Obama was confronted with questions over whether he was ready to be commander in chief and steward of the economy, he chose not to address those questions, but to attack Sen. Clinton," Wolfson said. "I for one do not believe that imitating Ken Starr is the way to win a Democratic primary election for president."


Because, you see, Hillary wants the media to "vet" Obama, but when it comes to vetting her and discussing the secrecy that surrounds her entire operation, it's a witch-hunt just like the Monica scandal was.

Clinton's people need to think long and hard about whether they REALLY want to go there. Yeah, the Kenneth Starr analogy may be some nice red meat for the people already sold on Hillary. But for everyone else, it's a reminder that Hillary comes with the entire Clinton legacy, not just the good parts of it. And by bringing this up, they're giving John McCain and the Republicans carte blanche to use it against Hillary should she be the nominee. And then they won't be able to claim it's an unfair attack, because they brought it up in the first place!

"He Can't Win Rural White Votes"

This is the line of thinking that's spreading around the blogosphere in light of Tuesday's primaries. Obama didn't win the rural white votes in Ohio, or in Tennessee for that matter, so that must mean that he can't win rural white votes at all.

But if that's the case, then I guess that Iowa, Kansas, Colorado, Idaho, Nebraska, North Dakota, and Minnesota must all be far more urban and African-American than anyone realized. These are all states that Obama won, and won handily, even though they are predominantly white and rural.

I tried to explain that this to Bob Krumm, which led to the accusation that I MUST be assuming that all these states are homogenous. My response to that is still "awaiting moderation" almost an hour later (that's all it is, a conservative would NEVER try to hide a counter-argument), so I'm reposting it here.

The county-by-county breakdowns for some of the states that I mentioned:

Kansas

Colorado

Idaho

Nebraska

North Dakota

Minnesota

Just look at the numbers. Obama won rural white counties all over the Midwest and the Rocky Mountain states. If the argument that he only wins urban voters were true, then you'd think that he would have just won the St. Paul/Minneapolis area in Minnesota or just the Denver area in Colorado. But that didn't happen.

So what happened in Ohio? Well, you could look at it and say Hillary did a better job of appealing to rural white voters there specifically, you could look at it and say that fear-mongering tactics work, or you could look at it as a state where Obama was down 20 points a month before the primary but still managed to get just under half of the available delegates.

But don't take the results of one state and try to proclaim a national trend from it. When Hillary wins 12 states in a row, then maybe we can start making some generalizations. The people in Kansas and Nebraska and Colorado are "working folks" just as much as the people of Ohio, and they decided Obama better represented them than Hillary.

One final point, as long as we're talking about rural voters...I would completely concur with the point that Obama needs to go to Appalachia for the next few primaries. I'll admit that I don't know much about the Appalachian regions in Pennsylvania. But I spent almost every summer in Hendersonville, North Carolina (about 30 minutes from Asheville) when I was growing up. Just looking at the demographics, at how much the situation has changed there in the last decade, I'd be shocked if Obama couldn't take the entire Asheville area.

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

I Miss John Edwards

I never thought I'd say that, given how much I opposed him early on, but last night it occurred to me that I do kinda miss him in this race.

(And somewhere, a former Edwards supporter is saying to themselves, "GoldnI, you unbelievably shameless little bitch.").

It's true though. Don't get me wrong, I had serious personal doubts about John Edwards and his proposals. But even after New Hampshire, I never called on Edwards to drop out of the race. The one thing that was never in doubt about Edwards, to me anyway, was that he did care about the long-term prosperity of the Democratic Party, about building a grassroots movement, about bringing in new voters and continuing the 50-state strategy. He understood, as Obama does, that it's not enough for Democrats to simply do what worked in the past, we need a new progressive movement.

If the primary race had ended up being between Obama and Edwards, it would have resulted in a positive and spirited debate about real issues. Maybe I'm just naive, but I really don't think Edwards would not have stooped to fear-mongering or calling someone else's religion into question, nor would anyone be talking about "the superdelegates."

But now, we have one candidate who understands that this election is much bigger than any one politician, and another candidate who would throw the entire party under the bus to keep her campaign going one day longer.

So you know what? Let's take this thing to Pennsylvania. I'm game, Ithaca is an hour and a half from the PA border. I'll be down there doing GOTV. And hey, we can re-do Florida and Michigan while we're at it, just so no one feels left out.

But after Obama is still leading in the popular vote and the pledged delegates after all of that, don't say "We're taking it all the way to Puerto Rico!" Puerto Rico definitely should not be considered "significant" to the Clintons, they don't have any electoral votes!

Fight For Your Right To Work Out

I saw this article earlier and wanted to comment on it, but got caught up in the Super Tuesday--The Sequel mess. In the midst of everything, we still managed to have a very interesting discussion about it on Daily Kos.

Over at Haaaahvahd, they're testing a new system in one of their gyms which would ban men from working out during certain hours. Why?

Harvard University has banned men from one of its gyms for a few hours a week, a move to accommodate Muslim women who, for religious and cultural reasons, cannot exercise comfortably in their presence.

**************************

The trial policy went into effect Feb. 4, about a month after a group of six Muslim women, with the support of the Harvard College Women's Center, asked the university for the special hours, spokesman Robert Mitchell said.

"We get special requests from religious groups all the time and we try to honor them whenever possible," he said, noting that the school has designated spaces for Muslim and Hindu students to pray.

No men are allowed in the gym between 3 p.m. and 5 p.m. on Mondays, and between 8 a.m. and 10 a.m on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Even the staff during those times is all women.

The special hours allow the Muslim women, who adhere to traditional dress codes by covering their hair and most of their skin while in public, to dress more appropriately for exercising, said Susan Marine, director of the women's center.

"It's a pretty big breach of their moral and religious code for a man to see them with their hair uncovered and it's just not possible for them to be in a mixed environment," she said.

First of all, just out of curiosity, do they even have enough Muslim students at Harvard for this to be a huge issue? During my year abroad in London, I went to a university that I would estimate was nearly 1/3 Muslim. We had a gym on campus, and this was never an issue. Granted, the gym on campus was pretty crappy. I worked out there simply for the convenience, but I knew plenty of girls who worked out elsewhere. But gender-segregation issues like this never came up there.

Here's the bigger issue though. Had they implemented this policy on behalf of all women, it wouldn't seem that big a deal. There are plenty of reasons why some women feel uncomfortable working out around men, regardless of religious beliefs. That's why women-only gyms like Curves are so successful. But this makes it pretty clear that it's just on behalf of Muslim women, not on behalf of all female students.

And this is where, in my opinion, you cross the line between accomodating one group's religious beliefs and infringing on another group's rights.

In the discussion on Daily Kos, some people made the comparison to colleges offering kosher food in the dining halls or having women-only dormitories. But there's a huge difference there. Serving kosher food in separate containers does not infringe upon those who aren't observant Jews, nor do women-only or other specialty dorms infringe on those who live elsewhere. At Cornell, we have a kosher dining hall, but it's open to anyone who wants to eat there, and indeed, plenty of non-Jewish students on West Campus eat there on a regular basis--it's convenient and the food's pretty good.

There was even a case at another school with a large number of Muslim students, University of Michigan-Dearborn, where they installed footbaths in some of the bathrooms to accomodate those who needed to wash their feet before they prayed. Again, as long as the footbaths are available to anyone who wants to use them, having them doesn't infringe upon anyone else's rights.

But when you're restricting access to a service that's supposed to be available to all students based on a small group's religious objections, that DOES, in fact, infringe on the rights of others. And a college campus that is supposed to provide students with equal access to its services should not be in the business of accomodating one religious group at the expense of everyone else.

And it's nothing against Islam. It'd be equally problematic if it were ultra-Orthodox women, or any other religious group.

If this is that big a deal for the university, what they ought to do is provide a separate room for women to work out in. Don't say it's just for Muslim women, open it up to all women who prefer to exercise in that environment. That way, Muslim women can work out comfortably, and no one is restricted from the gym of their choice.

Harvard is a private institution, so they're free to do as they please. But the way they're proposing to do this is only going to further isolate Muslim students from the rest of the student body and will only counterract the goals of a liberal institution.

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

Chris Matthews Is Funnier On SNL

Seriously, SNL ought to revive Darrell Hammond's spoof of Chris Matthews, that was hilarious.

I said this in the live-blog, but he's continuing to do it and it's driving me nuts. Since when are people with college degrees not "working people"? Since when does having a piece of paper indicate that you don't work as hard as those who don't? Last time I checked, having a college degree does not negate your need to pay the rent, it doesn't buy groceries, it doesn't make your health care free. So why frame it that way, other than to play into the narrative that Obama supporters are all a bunch of latte-sipping elitists?

She Can't Win

I just want to make that point very clearly.

She cannot win this thing just on pledged delegates. You can give her 55% of all remaining delegates (a near impossibility), and Obama is still ahead in pledged delegates. So her only hope is to either force the DNC to accept the tainted results from Florida or Michigan, or to rely on the superdelegates. Her only hope, really, is to override the party and the voters. She may still get the nomination that way, and I'll still vote for her (the girl muttering to herself in the voting booth in St. Louis, repeating "it's about the Supreme Court" over and over...that'll be me). Then, after she gets her ass handed to her by McCain, I'll start preparing for Obama's 2012 run.

And look at the contests we have coming up:

Wyoming--Obama. He's sweeping the Rocky Mountain states.
Mississippi--Obama. Look at how big he won Alabama and Georgia.
Pennsylvania--That could go either way. Hillary's winning but Obama will be strong in Philadelphia.
North Carolina--I say that goes Obama too. North Carolina's demographics are interesting--he'll take the Research Triangle area and the coast, Clinton will take Appalachia.
Indiana--Obama. See Iowa.
West Virginia--I'll say Clinton, but not totally out of reach for Obama.
Kentucky--Clinton.
Oregon--Definitely Obama.
Montana--Obama.
South Dakota--Obama.
Puerto Rico--Obama.

So, looking at the rest of the schedule, there is NO WAY she takes enough pledged delegates to win the nomination. And no matter what the media narrative is for tomorrow, no matter how much "momentum" Hillary has, the delegates are the real story.

Super Tuesday Super Live-Blog--The Sequel

The first polls close in 29 minutes, and then we'll start. Come on, Mama needs to get her daily visit average back up!

7:00 p.m.: Got my dinner (Lean Cuisine), got my caffeine, got American Idol TiVo'ed, I'm ready!

7:01 p.m.: Vermont called for Obama and for McCain. No delegate projection yet, the question MSNBC is positing is whether Obama can get more delegates in Vermont than Hillary will get net in the other states.

7:06 p.m.: Hillary didn't expect to win Vermont because it's a heavily "anti-war" state. Silly Vermonters, didn't they know that her Iraq vote was a vote for inspections, not for war?

7:07 p.m.: Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC--Hillary's "internal clock" will tell her when to get out of the race. Is that like your biological clock, which tells you when to have kids?

7:09 p.m.: Ohio polls close in 20 minutes, but that most likely won't be called right away. Rhode Island closes at 9. Texas also closes at 9, but part of the state (including El Paso) is in another time zone, so it won't REALLY be over there until 10. And then you have the caucuses. We may not know delegate counts in Texas until tomorrow.

7:14 p.m.: Just saw these exit poll numbers. I'm trying desperately not to get too worked up over it. But that combined with record high early voting numbers could be huge.

7:15: p.m.: 38% of voters in Vermont considered the war in Iraq to be the most important issue, only 1 point behind the economy. I didn't realize this, but Vermont has apparently suffered the highest rate of casualties per capita in Iraq. Obama won those voters 2:1.

7:17 p.m.: Obama carried white women in Vermont as well.

7:23 p.m.: According to Marc Ambinder, Vermont may very well be the most important state tonight. Since the delegate counts will be so close everywhere else, Obama could net 6-10 delegates in Vermont, further maintaining a clear lead over Hillary.

7:24 p.m.: Over on Daily Kos, my good friend DemocraticLuntz is trying to come up with new spin reasons why Hillary lost Vermont. Go help him out.

7:28 p.m.: Regardless of what Hillary says, Pennsylvania is NOT the next contest after this. The next one is on Saturday, it's the Wyoming caucus. And yes, I know that landlocked rural red states that hold caucuses rather than primaries are irrelevant, but there are 12 delegates at stake there!

7:30 p.m.: Ohio called for McCain, he will likely get at least 58 delegates from there. Mike Huckabee may not believe in math, but he's not going to get a miracle.

7:32 p.m.: Ohio still too close to call for the Democrats.

7:35 p.m.: While we're waiting, you can go play CNN's Delegate Counter game. It's pretty cool, but you can see after trying a few different scenarios that Hillary can't win without the superdelegates.

7:39 p.m.: I didn't catch which anchor it was, but one of the MSNBC anchors called Hillary's "as far as I know" comment on Obama's religion "positively Nixonian."

7:41 p.m.: Well, Hillary needed blowouts in Ohio and Texas to pull closer in the delegate race. The longer Ohio stays "too close to call", the lower the odds of that happening fall.

7:46 p.m.: Ohio exit polls--72% of Democratic voters in Ohio and 64% in Texas say the recent debates were important in their decisions. 52% in each state think that Hillary attacked Obama, while only around 30% in each considered Obama to be unfair.

7:48 p.m.: The polls in Sandusky County, Ohio will stay open until 9 due to bad weather there earlier today.

7:51 p.m.: Via Daily Kos, Cuyahoga County (Cleveland) will stay open later as well, until 8:30.

7:57 p.m.: The Obama campaign requested the extension in Cleveland because they ran out of ballots. EXCELLENT!!

8:07 p.m.: Via Braisted, Ohio has a really nifty election results page.

8:09 p.m.: Also via Braisted, Cleveland is going to be "FUBAR," and we may not get results out of there until tomorrow. Crap.

8:19 p.m.: Terry McAuliffe continues to insist that only Hillary has won the big, "important" states. And this is why he's not DNC chairman anymore.

8:21 p.m.: But on the other hand, it just sounded like McAuliffe endorsed a possible later primary for Michigan and Florida. But ONLY primaries, because caucuses are for elitists. Tweety is destroying him on MSNBC.

8:22 p.m.: Obama wins big in Texas early voting.

8:34 p.m.: Obama is winning huge in Austin, Dallas, and Houston according to the exit polls.

8:36 p.m.: According to MSNBC, 1 in 5 voters in Ohio said that race played an important factor in their decision. Before you start to say "Oh, well that was obviously black voters voting for the black candidate!", 8 in 10 of those voters voted for Clinton. And this is what we're basing 2008 on?

8:41 p.m.: A Huckabee aide told MSNBC that Huckabee will speak to McCain tomorrow to coordinate a concession.

8:47 p.m.: Here's where we're at IMHO. I think Hillary ultimately wins Ohio, although we may not know that for awhile. Hillary will obviously attempt to claim victory off of that and use it as a pretext to keep going. But it is crucial that Obama win the popular vote in Texas, rather than simply winning the delegate count. Because if he doesn't, the media narrative tomorrow is going to be all about "Hillary's comeback." Looking at the early voting results, it's entirely possible he did though.

8:49 p.m.: Hillary's people are now calling for an "emergency press conference call" to discuss "caucus intimidation." Translation--they lost Texas.

8:50 p.m.: Tomorrow, Bush will officially endorse McCain. I hope we get another awkward hug picture.

8:59 p.m.: Via Marc Ambinder, the caucus sites that Hillary's people are complaining about. All Obama-friendly areas, naturally.

9:00 p.m.: Texas and Rhode Island go for McCain. Based on MSNBC's delegate count, he now *officially* has enough delegates to win the Republican nomination.

9:01 p.m.: Texas still too close to call for the Democrats, but Obama is ahead. Also, Rhode Island is still too close to call.

9:02 p.m.: You would think Rhode Island would have been one of those ones they could call based on exit polls, even without having hard numbers. After all, Hillary was supposed to have such a huge lead in Rhode Island, right? RIIIIIIGHT?

9:06 p.m.: Texas exit polls--Hillary wins Latinos and white women, Obama wins African-Americans, white men still split.

9:08 p.m.: I heard about this earlier today, but someone with the Obama campaign told Tom Brokaw that they have 50 superdelegates ready to come out and endorse. I say do it tomorrow, especially if Hillary tries to claim victory off of Ohio. Destroy that news cycle.

9:20 p.m.: Huckabee's speaking. In more important news, it looks like Rhode Island is going to be tight.

9:22 p.m.: Never mind, Hillary wins Rhode Island. But remember, Rhode Island is a small state, so they'd BETTER not try to claim it's important!

9:31 p.m.: Governor Huckabee, what's your point?

9:44 p.m.: Ed Rendell says that he'd work his heart out for Obama if he gets the nomination, even though he hopes it's Hillary. Translation--he knows it's over.

9:45 p.m.: Looking at the calendar again--we've got Wyoming on Saturday, then Mississippi next Tuesday with 33 more delegates. After that, Pennsylvania isn't until April 22. Honestly, I don't think I can do this for seven more weeks.

9:55 p.m.: McCain speakinzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.....

10:06 p.m.: Tweety says that McCain may go for California. Excellent. Sink several millions into California and see where that gets you.

10:24 p.m.: Cleveland is saying they won't have final numbers until 4:30 a.m. Yeah, I'm not staying up that late. I'm not ruling out setting an alarm and waking up then, but I'm going to bed before then. But they barely have anything in from there, Cincinatti, Columbus, or Dayton right now.

10:36 p.m.: Sorry, trying to do genetics homework at the same time. We're now hearing that Obama may have lost the early vote in Cleveland. Shit.

10:52 p.m.: MSNBC calls Ohio for Hillary. I want to see what the margin ends up being.

10:53 p.m.: Tweety's been saying something all night that's annoying the hell out of me. He's been implying that people who have college degrees are not "working people." Since when? Last I checked my dad goes to work every day.

11:40 p.m.: I'm wrapping this up for now, because I really do have work for tomorrow. I'll update with anything else.

Proof That Cornell Students Are Not Elitists

Just to briefly take a break from politics...

I am pleased to inform you that we now have solid evidence that Cornell students are not the most spoiled, most elitist bunch of kids in the nation. Princeton has just pulled off something that makes the rest of us look positively grounded. At Princeton's Whitman College, they are starting a new voluntary program for underclassmen to get a "taste" of what it's like to write a senior thesis:


The voluntary Whitman Thesis Buddies program will pair each participating Whitman senior with two underclassmen who will be “on call” during the three weeks prior to their senior’s thesis deadline.

In an e-mail to residents of the college last week, Whitman College Director of Studies Cole Crittenden explained that participating underclassmen will be responsible for helping their senior buddies out with such things as “picking up a midnight snack, taking care of a load of laundry, picking up/dropping off some library books, or proofreading a chapter for spelling mistakes.


How freaking spoiled and lazy are these Princeton kids that they need personal assistants to help them write their theses? They wouldn't need "thesis buddies" if they had the work ethic of Cornellians. And when I say work ethic, I mean procrastination skills.

This especially pisses me off because at Cornell, those of us in sororities aren't even allowed to make our pledges do stuff like this! Apparently, what Princeton defines as "assisting an upperclassman", Cornell defines as "hazing."

A Wide Stance On Hillary

This is pretty funny. It seems that in Austin, the Clinton campaign set up a filing center for its travelling press corps--in a men's restroom. It's a live-blog that puts my own live-blogs to shame.

UPDATE: According to the schedule, we will be here in the men's room for the next five hours. Someone will soon have to declare a moratorium on the "down the toilet" jokes.

UPDATE2: Hey, Jay: Is it true Obama has put his press corps in the Golden Door Spa tonight?

UPDATE3: There's also dinner and a television in here. I really wish I had Ana's little camera thing-ee, so I could share.

UPDATE4: CNN has a photo.

UPDATE5: A wider shot (wider stance?) from my own cellphone is posted two entries above this one. A gentleman just wandered in, expecting to use the facilities, and looked very startled to see three dozen reporters typing away on their laptops.


Check out this other photo and submit a caption idea, if you like.

And then the Hillary people wonder why the media doesn't like them.

Monday, March 3, 2008

Hillary Writing McCain's Talking Points

First came the "3 a.m." ad. Now this?


Hillary Clinton told reporters that both she and the presumtive Republican nominee John McCain offer the experience to be ready to tackle any crisis facing the country under their watch, but Barack Obama simply offers more rhetoric. “I think you'll be able to imagine many things Senator McCain will be able to say,” she said. “He’s never been the president, but he will put forth his lifetime of experience. I will put forth my lifetime of experience. Senator Obama will put forth a speech he made in 2002.” Clinton was referring to Obama’s anti-war speech he delivered in Chicago before entering the United States Senate.


Two things:

First, "he's never been the president?" Oh, so Hillary has? So the first Clinton Administration really was a "co-presidency"? Hey Hillary, you know we have a constitutional amendment about that. But hey, I guess since the current Democratic voters in Michigan and Florida didn't get to vote on that amendment, it doesn't really count.

Second, is she not explicitly saying that she thinks McCain would be better able to handle a crisis than Obama, that McCain would in fact be preferable?

Hey, remember that whole flap about Michelle Obama saying that she'd "have to think about supporting Hillary"? She didn't say that another candidate would be preferable, or even that she'd vote for another candidate, just that she'd have to think about how much support she'd give. Yet the Hillary supporters went bonkers over this perceived "disloyalty".

Hillary just blatantly said that she considers a Republican candidate preferable to a Democratic one. If Michelle Obama's comment was disloyalty, then Hillary is right up there with Judas Iscariot and Benedict Arnold. I'm sure McCain's media people are already racking their brains to figure out how to work this comment into their ads and narratives.

It's been said so many times before, but...this woman will bring down the party to get her way. It's not about progressive policies, it's not about rebuilding the Democratic Party, hell, it's not even about feminism. It's about getting the Clintons back into the White House, no matter the cost.

It's up to you now, Texas and Ohio. The fate of the democracy is in your hands.

Bill Richardson Endorses Obama

Well, not in the official sense. But he came pretty damn close:

Speaking on CBS's "Face the Nation," Richardson said: "I just think that D-Day is Tuesday. We have to have a positive campaign after Tuesday. Whoever has the most delegates after Tuesday, a clear lead, should be, in my judgment, the nominee."

Richardson also took issue with Hillary's "red phone" ad:

"I happen to disagree with that ad that says that Senator Obama is not ready," he said. "He is ready. He has great judgment, an internationalist background."


As has been noted several times, should Obama do well tomorrow, say by winning Texas and keeping it tight in Ohio, then it becomes almost mathematically impossible for Hillary to win the nomination without relying on superdelegates. She'd have to win all the remaining contests by enormous margins, far more than any she's won so far. And barring blowouts in both Texas and Ohio tomorrow, Obama will still have the clear lead. Ergo, under Richardson's logic, Obama should be the nominee. That's an endorsement without using the word "endorse."

This would be, of course, an enormous reversal for him. He's a close friend of the Clintons who very recently watched the Super Bowl with the former President. Only a month later, he's now openly criticizing her "closing argument" and coming very close to endorsing Obama.

Even if Obama does well tomorrow, Hillary will certainly not want to drop out. But the pressure on her will be enormous. Expect official endorsements from Richardson and other high-profile Democrats. While taking the contest to Ohio and Texas (where party organization for November is crucial) was not a bad thing, keeping this going much longer would be a waste of the time and resources needed to make the Democratic case against John McCain.

UPDATE: I didn't see Face The Nation, but I just saw the clip of it on Olbermann. Can someone please inform Governor Richardson that it's still a little early for the playoff beard?

Sunday, March 2, 2008

Happy Birthday To Me

March 3, 2007. My 21st birthday. I wake up in a youth hostel in Athens, Greece. The warm Mediterranean sunshine was a welcome respite from the dreary London weather. Despite the fact that I had already been able to legally drink for six months in my junior year abroad, that wasn't going to stop me from having a 21st birthday to remember. My friends and I spent the day climbing the Acropolis and visiting the rest of the ruins, bearing witness to the birthplace of Western civilization. That night, we drank plenty of red wine and ouzo (which is a terrible combination, I would not recommend it if you don't want to have migraines the next day), ate some authentic Greek food (including the biggest, sweetest piece of baklava you've ever seen), and partied with the Australians from our hostel. It was, all in all, the best birthday ever.

March 3, 2008. My 22nd birthday. I will wake up to another cold and snowy Ithaca morning. I have to get up really early tomorrow morning to take my car into the shop because my alternator is broken. I am so car-illiterate that I couldn't tell you what an alternator is or where it is located in my engine, but apparently that's what's causing my battery to keep dying. Monday's are already my longest class days, and I will be on campus from 10 a.m. until 4:30 p.m. Instead of having fun tomorrow night, I'll be writing a paper for my history seminar on Tuesday. Oh yeah, I'm also really sick right now. I feel like I have a 100-pound weight on my sinuses. I've gone through almost an entire box of Kleenex today. And I just know that at some point tomorrow, my mother will call me and say, "You know, I was married at 22!"

What I'm trying to say is...Texas and Ohio, if you can't give me a Greek vacation for my birthday, at least give me an Obama win to make this misery worth it!

Back To The Fainting Couch

I was wondering if Tennessee Guerilla Women would say anything about this article from the Washington Post. It is, after all, disgustingly sexist. But of course, because it starts out by bashing female Obama supporters, not a word from them. So I'll be the good feminist for today.

The author of the op-ed, Charlotte Allen (whom I'm guessing fancies herself as an Ann Coulter wannabe), starts out by noticing the reactions of women at Obama events, and asks a simple question:


I can't help it, but reading about such episodes of screaming, gushing and swooning makes me wonder whether women -- I should say, "we women," of course -- aren't the weaker sex after all. Or even the stupid sex, our brains permanently occluded by random emotions, psychosomatic flailings and distraction by the superficial.


Oh yes, we're stupid! We're emotional! We're weak!

The op-ed goes on to hit every single cliche about women in the book--Oprah, Celine Dion, daytime soaps, romance novels, "Grey's Anatomy", women are bad drivers, and on and on. In fact, the only things I can think of offhand that she left out was that we also do all this while reading Cosmo, eating chocolate, and whining about how our boyfriends won't commit and/or put the toilet seat down.

But this is the best:

So I don't understand why more women don't relax, enjoy the innate abilities most of us possess (as well as the ones fewer of us possess) and revel in the things most important to life at which nearly all of us excel: tenderness toward children and men and the weak and the ability to make a house a home.

Ah yes, women are too dumb and too emotional for politics.

You know what, maybe she's right. I definitely feel dumber today. Dumber for having wasted five minutes reading that article!

Perhaps if Ms. Allen really believes all this, then she shouldn't be writing columns for the Washington Post. After all, the several hours that it must have taken to write all that were several hours that she could have spent in the kitchen or in the laundry room!

And hey, Hillary supporters--even though she starts off by bashing Obama supporters, by extension she's also bashing you! She fully states that Hillary is too emotional and too sentimental to be President! It's incredibly sexist--I criticize Hillary based on policy and on her dirty campaigning, but I would definitely agree this crosses a line. So why the silence from the Hillary supporters on this?

You know, it's not really "feminism" if you're silent on certain instances of misogyny because it's more politically expedient that way.

I Don't Want To Be Saved

I'm ready to start talking about other stuff, but I just want to make this last point.

This thread
got me thinking about the South Park episode, "Do The Handicapped Go To Hell?" There's a scene in the second part where a group of people are entering Hell, and one man shouts, "How can I be in Hell? I've been a devout Baptist my whole life!" The Hell tour guide tells the man, "Well, you were wrong." When the man asks who was right, the guide replies, "The Mormons. The Mormons were right."

The point is, I'm happy the way I am and I don't want to be "saved," so don't waste your breath.

I know I've said this before, but even if you think you're doing it out of some great "love" for the Jewish people, if your goal is to eventually see the end of the Jewish religion through conversions, then guess what? You're as much of an anti-Semite as Farrakhan, even if you think you just LOVE you some Jews!

You might reply, "But we just don't want you to go to Hell!"

Frankly, if it's only right-wing evangelical Christians who go to Heaven, then I'd rather go to Hell. By that definition, Heaven will be boring and depressing, while Hell will be one big kickass party. The Catholics will be there, and if anyone knows how to throw a party, it's them (see: Mardi Gras/Carnivale, St. Patrick's Day, Cinco de Mayo, Columbus Day in New York City). Other religions will be invited--the Muslims can bring some hookah and the Hindus can play their excellent bhangra music. We Jews will supply the food. I'm not exactly sure what the Buddhists' and the atheists' roles will be in all of this, but I'm open to suggestions. It'll be great though--we can all have a fun time together without the right-wing evangelicals telling us that having fun is a SI-YIN!

This statement is not meant to offend anyone. This isn't directed at Christians as a whole, just the ones who would say, "We want your religion to be eliminated and for you all to convert, but WE ARE NOT ANTI-SEMITIC!"

The Sunday Liberal Blog Roundup, 3-2-08


The Sunday "oh, no he didn't? or, it's been an extra long leap week for the TN GOP" edition of the TennViews weekly blog roundup showcasing the best and brightest bloggers in Tennessee and what they are talking about...

• 55-40 Memphis: Second biggest fear, plus: Beale Street tribute hits a sour note.

• Andy Axel (at KnoxViews): TNGOP playing politics with the State Constitution,

• Aunt B.: On the TNGOP attempt to establish guilt by association, plus leave Bill Hobbs alone!

• BlountViews: How embarrassing would it be to be a member of the TNGOP right now?

• Carole Borges: Obama's formula for success: radical centrism.

• The Crone Speaks: On the failure of the abortion amendment, plus the TNGOP apparently never got the Karl Rove memo, and, notes to Clinton and Obama from candidates who dropped out.

• Cup of Joe Powell: On the Bill Hobbs implosion, plus cheers for the TNGOP, bonus: Vampires!

• Don Williams: Help fight mountaintop removal.

• The Donkey's Mouth: TNGOP: Gutter politics, McCain denounces, scolded by RNC.

• Enclave: Gathering the NAFTA pitchforks, plus TNGOP: Leave Obama's momma out of it, part 1 and part 2.

• Fletch: Cute by any other name, what do you see, and barking at the moon is a full time job.

• KnoxViews: Where in the world is Smokey? Plus: respect for Hillary, and who will answer the call?

• Lean Left: KTK: Obama comes out for gay rights and a weight is lifted

• Left of the Dial: Money fuels the debate over XM/SIRIUS merger

• Left Wing Cracker: RIP Rep. Gary Rowe, plus Hobbs has outdone himself.

• Liberadio: 2008 election results leaked, plus a little desensitizing.

• Loose TN Canon: Hobbs deleted my comments!

• NewsComa: Hobbs wins the Tennessee Wanker award and it's only February!

• Pesky Fly: Obama brings out the knives.

• Progressive Nashville: Something in the Arizona water? Plus: TNGOP thinks cheap stunts are acceptable behavior.

• Resonance: Superdelegates jumping between bandwagons, plus slacker Silent Clarence.

• RoaneViews: Chris Lugo: Nuclear free Tennessee, plus: When a potential business recruit comes to Roane County, does Leslie show them the new Jail?

• Russ McBee: Bernake predicts bank failures, plus a note to Bill Hobbs.

• Sean Braisted: Celebrity endorsements. Plus: Save Bill Hobbs!

• Sharon Cobb: Tennessee medical hero Stan Brock on 60 Minutes tonight, here's a backgrounder. Plus: Elect Hussein Obama!

• Silence Isn't Golden: Bigots for McCain, Republicans should show the same support for Tennessee that they do for Israel, natural allies in the fight against discrimination and justice. Bonus: Fulmer for Sheriff!

• Southern Beale: Prison Nation, fun with FISA.

• Tennessee Guerilla Women: Hillary tag teamed on SNL, plus some interesting quotes from Obama re. the Iraq war vote.

• TennViews: TNGOP playing politics with long-term care for seniors , plus TNGOP: There is such a thing as bad publicity, Gutterball, as it unfolded.

• Vibinc: Motivational waterboarding? Seriously, he's not making this up!

• Whites Creek Journal: Surviving Leap Day, plus: Obama fathered TWO black babies!

• Women's Health News: Workplace lactation, plus the Nipple Project.

Saturday, March 1, 2008

The Most Important Story Of The Week

Everyone's missing it.

The most important story of the week had nothing to do with Hillary, McCain, or Obama. It's not about how the TNGOP thinks that Jewish voters are just as gullible as their evangelical base. It's not about FISA, Iraq, or Israel. It's not about the economy.

No, it just happened tonight:

Cornell had waited 20-years to cut down the nets as Ivy League champions. The wait is over.

There was jubilation on the court as Cornell head coach Steve Donahue and his players took turns snipping the net and taking away a piece of history.

Adam Gore scored 14 points and Ryan Wittman added 13 for Cornell in its 86-53 win over Harvard to win the Ivy League and earn an NCAA tournament berth.

The Big Red last won an Ivy League title in 1988 and no team other than Penn or Princeton has won the league since then.


That's right, it's the start of March Madness and Cornell just became the very first team in the NCAA to clinch an NCAA berth! The Ivy League does not have a post-season tournament, so the regular season winner goes to the NCAA's (although personally I don't like this system, but I'll take it this time).

I don't know what seed we'll get. I think if we win out, we should be considered for a #12 (because I don't care what conference it is, going undefeated in conference play is a rare feat and should be rewarded). I just hope they don't end up playing Vanderbilt in the first round.